Building on Previous Jurisprudential Rulings: Worships as an Example: Building on Previous Jurisprudential Rulings: Worships as an Example

Abstract

This study was organized between rooting of the concept of building on the previous juridical rulings and the application of the concept in a number of issues. The researcher used the inductive-analytical approach to clarify that building on previous rulings only takes place in the case of an emergency defect occurring during uninterrupted true worship. That imposes sufficiency or exoneration, whether it is performed by the act of the person himself/herself, such as fasting, or the act of others such as being the imam. This research consisted of an introduction, four sections, and a conclusion. The introduction included the significance of the study, its problem, methodology, and plan. The first section included the definitions and terminology of building, governance, and legitimacy, Then the concept of building and its image is discussed. The second section included the reasons for building on previous juridical rulings and its conditions. The third section included building in the case of an emergency defect and not an original defect. It also included how such building is based on correct deeds and not corrupt ones, and not after a break. The fourth section included applications of jurisprudential rulings in which it was correct to build on what passed, such as building on cleanliness, Azan, prayers, Friday sermon, fasting, and Tawaf.